Day: August 28, 2024

AI Crypto Market Surges Before Nvidia Earnings

This post was originally published on this site

The market capitalization for artificial intelligence and big data cryptocurrency projects has experienced a significant surge, climbing by an impressive 79.7% over the past three weeks. This surge reflects growing confidence among crypto investors, particularly as the broader AI narrative gains momentum in 2024. The AI crypto market is now a focal point for investors, with many closely watching how this sector evolves alongside key technological developments.

AI Crypto Market Resurgence

On August 6, the AI crypto market reached a yearly low with a market cap of $18.21 billion. This decline was largely attributed to broader struggles in the cryptocurrency market, compounded by Bitcoin’s sharp price drop to $49,500 on August 5. This downturn followed the Bank of Japan’s unexpected decision to raise interest rates, which sent shockwaves through the global financial markets.

Despite these challenges, AI and big data tokens have demonstrated remarkable resilience. By August 25, the market cap for AI and big data crypto projects had more than doubled, surpassing $38 billion. This recovery mirrors Bitcoin’s rebound but highlights the growing independence and strength of the AI crypto market.

Leading AI Crypto Tokens

As of August 27, several AI and big data tokens have emerged as leaders in the market. Near Protocol leads the pack with a market cap of $5.5 billion. Internet Computer follows closely with $3.8 billion, the Artificial Superintelligence Alliance stands at $3.4 billion, and Bittensor rounds out the top contenders with a market cap of $2.8 billion. These tokens represent the forefront of innovation in the AI crypto market, attracting significant investor interest.

The recent rise in AI tokens has been fueled by a broader narrative around AI technology, which has gained substantial traction in 2024. This momentum is closely tied to the strong performance of Nvidia (NASDAQ:NVDA), a leading player in the AI hardware space. Nvidia’s advancements in AI technology and its influence on the sector cannot be overstated. The company’s earnings reports often serve as a bellwether for the AI crypto market, with positive results frequently followed by rallies in AI-related tokens.

Investor Activity and Market Movements

The surge in the AI crypto market has also been marked by notable investor activity. Onchain analytics platform Lookonchain recently highlighted unusual transactions in the sector, particularly focusing on a large whale’s movements in the FET token. This whale, after selling FET tokens at a lower price earlier, repurchased 1.79 million FET tokens at a higher price of $1.33 on August 25, spending $2.38 million in USDT. This activity underscores the volatility and rapid changes in sentiment within the AI crypto market, where large investors can significantly influence price movements.

The Nvidia Effect on AI Crypto

The influence of Nvidia’s stock performance on the AI crypto market is well-documented. Nvidia’s strong position in the AI hardware space has made it a key player in the broader AI narrative. The company’s earnings announcements are eagerly anticipated by both traditional and crypto investors. With Nvidia scheduled to release its quarterly results on August 28, there is heightened anticipation in the AI crypto market. Positive earnings from Nvidia could further boost AI tokens, continuing the upward trend seen over the past few weeks.

Investors in the AI crypto market are closely monitoring Nvidia’s performance, as the chipmaker’s success is often seen as a proxy for the health of the entire AI sector. A strong earnings report from Nvidia could lead to further gains in AI crypto tokens, as the sector continues to attract attention from both retail and institutional investors.

Conclusion: The Future of AI Crypto

The recent surge in the AI crypto market highlights the growing importance of AI and big data projects within the broader cryptocurrency landscape. As AI technology continues to advance and gain mainstream attention, the demand for AI-related tokens is likely to increase. The upcoming Nvidia earnings report will be a crucial indicator for the market, potentially driving further growth in AI crypto assets.

In the coming months, the AI crypto market is expected to remain a dynamic and rapidly evolving space, with significant opportunities for investors who can navigate its complexities. As the sector continues to mature, the relationship between AI technology developments and the performance of AI crypto tokens will likely become even more intertwined, shaping the future of both industries.

Featured Image: Freepik

Please See Disclaimer

Maker Rebrands as Sky in DeFi, Launches USDS Stablecoin

This post was originally published on this site

Maker Protocol, a pioneer in the decentralized finance space, has officially rebranded itself as Sky, marking a significant shift in its strategy and offerings. This Sky DeFi rebranding includes the introduction of a new suite of upgrades aimed at making DeFi more accessible and user-friendly. Among the most notable changes is the rebranding of Maker’s widely-used decentralized stablecoin, Dai, to USDS. Additionally, the platform’s governance token, formerly known as MKR, has been upgraded and rebranded as Sky within this new ecosystem.

The Evolution of DeFi: Sky’s New Vision

This rebranding represents what MakerDAO co-founder Rune Christensen describes as the “next evolution of DeFi.” The Sky DeFi rebranding is not just a cosmetic change but reflects a deeper transformation in how the protocol operates and interacts with its users. Christensen highlighted the platform’s renewed focus on simplicity and usability, which aims to make DeFi more approachable for a broader audience. With innovative features like Sky Token Rewards and the Sky Savings Rate , the platform is set to offer enhanced benefits to users in eligible jurisdictions.

The rebranding extends beyond just the names of the stablecoin and governance token. Maker’s SubDAOs, which have been integral to its decentralized ecosystem, will now be known as Sky Stars. These independent, decentralized projects will continue to operate within the Sky ecosystem, each with its own unique business model and autonomy. The first Sky Star to launch is Spark, an open-source decentralized liquidity protocol. Spark currently offers a 6% yield for users depositing DAI tokens and allows borrowing of USDS at a 7% interest rate, signaling the platform’s commitment to offering competitive financial products.

Sky Stars: Decentralized Innovation

The concept of Sky Stars is central to the Sky DeFi rebranding. Each Sky Star subDAO will have the autonomy to issue its governance token, manage its treasury, and make independent decisions. This structure is designed to foster innovation and allow these subDAOs to take risks while the core Sky Protocol focuses on maintaining the stability and security of the USDS stablecoin. Christensen emphasized that “Core Sky Governance will protect against risks in the tail end, while Stars specialize in doing business in the trenches,” highlighting the balance between innovation and stability within the Sky ecosystem.

This decentralized approach allows for a more dynamic and responsive development environment, where each Sky Star can pursue its initiatives and business models. The Sky DeFi rebranding is thus positioned as a move towards a more modular and adaptable ecosystem, where various projects can thrive independently yet contribute to the overall strength of the Sky Protocol.

Token Upgrades: MKR to SKY

Another significant aspect of the Sky DeFi rebranding is the upgrade and rebranding of the MKR governance token to SKY. This transition involves a substantial change in token distribution, with MKR being upgraded to SKY at a 1:24,000 ratio. Christensen believes that this change will democratize access to the ecosystem, making it easier for users to engage with the platform. “The larger supply of SKY improves the experience for those who want to purchase more than just a fraction of the token,” Christensen explained, indicating that the new token structure is designed to attract a broader base of users.

This move is expected to increase participation in governance and the overall ecosystem, as more users will be able to acquire and hold SKY tokens. The expanded token supply also aligns with the platform’s goal of making DeFi more accessible and inclusive.

Conclusion: The Future of Sky DeFi

The Sky DeFi rebranding marks a pivotal moment in the evolution of the Maker Protocol. By rebranding as Sky and introducing significant upgrades like the USDS stablecoin and the SKY governance token, the platform is positioning itself for broader adoption and long-term success. The introduction of Sky Stars further enhances the ecosystem’s flexibility, allowing for innovation and growth within a stable and secure framework.

As DeFi continues to evolve, Sky’s new identity and offerings are likely to play a crucial role in shaping the future of decentralized finance. With a focus on accessibility, innovation, and stability, Sky is well-positioned to lead the next wave of DeFi development.

Featured Image: Freepik 

Please See Disclaimer

AI Data Center Expansion Strains U.S. Energy Supply

This post was originally published on this site

As U.S. technology companies race to expand their artificial intelligence and cloud computing data centers, they are increasingly targeting energy assets held by bitcoin miners. This AI data center expansion is driving a surge in U.S. power demand, the fastest since the turn of the millennium, which has led to fierce competition for electricity resources. Major tech companies, including Amazon (NASDAQ:AMZN) and Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT), are at the forefront of this scramble, seeking vast amounts of power to fuel their growing AI ambitions.

AI Data Centers Drive Power Demand

The rapid expansion of AI data centers has become a significant factor in the U.S. energy market. These centers are expected to consume up to 9% of the nation’s total electricity by the end of the decade, more than double their current usage, according to the Electric Power Research Institute. Currently, data centers account for 1%-1.3% of global electricity consumption, while bitcoin mining consumes approximately 0.4%. This gap is expected to widen as AI data center expansion continues.

The demand for electricity from AI data centers is putting immense pressure on the energy-intensive cryptocurrency mining industry. Some bitcoin miners have found themselves in a favorable position, making substantial profits by leasing or selling their power-connected infrastructure to tech companies. Others, however, are struggling to secure the electricity needed to sustain their operations.

Tech Giants Outbid Bitcoin Miners for Energy Resources

The AI data center expansion has led to a bidding war between tech giants and bitcoin miners for power assets. For instance, Marathon Digital Holdings (NASDAQ:MARA), the world’s largest publicly traded bitcoin miner, expressed interest in a nuclear-powered data center owned by Talen Energy in Pennsylvania. However, Amazon, with its significantly larger market capitalization, ultimately acquired the center in a deal announced in March. This acquisition secured Amazon enough electricity to power nearly all the homes in New Mexico.

This growing interest from technology companies in power assets traditionally held by bitcoin miners reflects a broader shift in the market. Miners who own substantial land and energy resources are increasingly pivoting from exclusive cryptocurrency mining to offering their services to AI and cloud computing businesses. TeraWulf, a bitcoin mining company with a site in upstate New York capable of up to 770 megawatts, has received interest from major tech firms like Amazon and Google (NASDAQ:GOOG).

The Economic Potential of AI Data Center Expansion

The economic potential of AI data centers has not gone unnoticed by the cryptocurrency mining industry. A study by Morgan Stanley revealed that repurposing bitcoin mining facilities for AI and cloud computing could increase their value by up to five times. By buying or leasing space at a miner with at least 100 MW of capacity, technology companies can reduce the launch time for a data center by about 3.5 years, saving billions of dollars.

However, this transition is not without challenges. The infrastructure required for AI data centers is far more sophisticated than that needed for bitcoin mining. Most bitcoin mines can be constructed in six to twelve months, whereas building an AI data center typically takes three years. This difference in complexity means that many miners would need to rebuild their facilities to meet the specialized cooling and infrastructure requirements of AI and cloud computing.

The Tough Road Ahead for Bitcoin Miners

Not all bitcoin miners are eager to make the switch to AI. CleanSpark (NASDAQ:CLSK) CEO Zach Bradford has expressed skepticism about the ability of most bitcoin miners to successfully transition to AI data center operations. He stated that CleanSpark would continue to focus on crypto mining as its core business, citing the high costs and technical challenges associated with building AI data centers.

The financial barriers to entering the AI data center market are significant. Many bitcoin miners, who were largely cut off from capital markets after the 2022 bitcoin price crash, lack the funds necessary to compete with tech giants. Sergii Gerasymovych, CEO of EZ Blockchain, highlighted the disparity in financial resources between crypto miners and tech companies. In one instance, his company lost a 10-MW project to a hyperscaling AI company with billions of dollars at its disposal.

As the race for energy resources intensifies, bitcoin miners must decide whether to adapt to the new landscape or risk being pushed out by the growing dominance of AI and cloud computing.

Featured Image: Freepik

Please See Disclaimer

SEC Targets OpenSea in Potential NFT Lawsuit

This post was originally published on this site

OpenSea, the self-proclaimed “world’s largest” nonfungible token marketplace, is currently under scrutiny by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. On Wednesday, the company disclosed that it received a Wells notice from the SEC, signaling that the regulator may soon file a lawsuit against OpenSea. The notice suggests that the SEC considers NFTs traded on OpenSea’s platform to be unregistered securities, a claim that has significant implications for the entire cryptocurrency and NFT industry.

SEC’s Focus on OpenSea: A Broader Crackdown on Crypto?

The SEC’s interest in OpenSea is part of a broader trend of regulatory actions against cryptocurrency-related businesses. Recently, the SEC has pursued similar claims against major players in the crypto industry, such as Binance and Coinbase (NASDAQ:COIN). These actions underscore the agency’s growing focus on digital assets, which it increasingly views as securities subject to federal regulation.

In a tweet, OpenSea CEO Devin Finzer responded to the SEC’s Wells notice by defending the status of NFTs and the broader cryptocurrency ecosystem. He emphasized that cryptocurrency companies have “long been in the crosshairs of the SEC,” arguing that NFTs should not be classified as traditional securities, despite their nature as tradable assets with value.

The SEC, consistent with its usual practice, did not confirm or deny the existence of an investigation into OpenSea. In an email to TechCrunch, an SEC spokesperson declined to comment on the matter.

OpenSea’s Stance: Defending the NFT Industry

Faced with the possibility of a lawsuit, OpenSea has taken a firm stance in defense of the NFT industry. CEO Devin Finzer has vowed to “fight for our industry,” signaling OpenSea’s readiness to challenge the SEC’s assertions in court. The company has also pledged $5 million to cover legal fees for NFT creators and developers who have similarly received Wells notices from the SEC.

This commitment reflects the high stakes involved in the case, not just for OpenSea, but for the entire NFT ecosystem. If the SEC’s classification of NFTs as unregistered securities is upheld, it could lead to widespread changes in how NFTs are traded and regulated, potentially stifling innovation in the space.

Implications for the NFT and Crypto Markets

The SEC’s actions against OpenSea could set a precedent that affects the broader cryptocurrency and digital asset markets. If the agency successfully argues that NFTs are securities, it may pave the way for more stringent regulations on other digital assets that are currently traded with minimal oversight.

For OpenSea, this legal battle could be a defining moment in its existence. The company, which has quickly risen to prominence as the leading marketplace for NFTs, now faces a challenge that could reshape its business model and the industry it helped to pioneer. While OpenSea is prepared to defend its position, the outcome of this potential lawsuit could have far-reaching consequences for the entire digital asset market.

The broader crypto industry is watching closely, as the case could influence how other digital assets are classified and regulated in the future. Cryptocurrency companies, which have long operated in a relatively unregulated space, may need to reconsider their strategies if the SEC’s approach to NFTs is any indication of future regulatory trends.

Looking Forward: What’s Next for OpenSea?

As OpenSea prepares to face the SEC in what could be a landmark case, the company’s commitment to defending the NFT industry is clear. However, the legal battle ahead is likely to be complex and drawn out, with significant implications for the market depending on the outcome.

For now, the focus remains on how OpenSea and other NFT marketplaces will navigate this new regulatory landscape. The company’s response to the SEC’s actions will not only determine its future but could also set the stage for how NFTs and digital assets are treated under U.S. law moving forward.

OpenSea’s journey from an innovative startup to the target of a high-profile regulatory challenge highlights the growing pains of the digital asset industry. As the legal proceedings unfold, the eyes of the cryptocurrency and investment communities will be on this case, waiting to see how it will shape the future of NFTs and digital assets.

Featured Image: Freepik

Please See Disclaimer

‘I feel like a fool’: I loaned my friend and former lover $50,000 to help her buy a home — now she’s treating it as a gift

This post was originally published on this site

I had a fling with a very nice woman about two years ago, and we became friends. She was not interested in a relationship with me, which was disappointing at the time and, even though I loved her and wanted her to love me back, I respected her decision. A few years ago, she took advantage of the low interest rates and bought an apartment with a 3.5% 30-year rate. I gradually put $50,000 into her bank account so she would have that cash cushion ahead of her interview with the co-op board. They accepted her, and she moved in.

The problem: She has continued as if the money was a gift. I have brought up the fact that I would like her to repay the money — as agreed at the time — and she said she’s doing her best. But the more time that goes by, the more I have come to realize that she has no intention of ever paying me back. In a worst-case scenario, the loan will need to be written off as bad debt; assuming that happens, how do I account for that on my taxes? I feel like she had no intention of paying me back, although knowing her that’s hard to believe.

In the meantime, how can I persuade her to repay me the $50,000? 

Fool for Love & Money

Related: I lost $240,000 after a ‘friend’ I met on Instagram encouraged me to invest in crypto. Can I write off my loss?

Dear Love & Money,

People will do what comes easiest.

At this moment in time, having a bank balance that is $50,000 richer makes life easier for her. In some ways, it’s not personal, which makes the whole affair even more difficult to process. The first rule of loaning money to friends: Don’t do it. The second: If you do, don’t loan what you can’t afford to lose. The third: The relationship will rarely, if ever, be the same. And the golden rule for you: You made a decision to lend this woman money because you wanted something from her — her approval, respect, love, attention. You were and/or are in love with her, and she exploited that to get what she wanted.

The co-op board and lender are trying to ascertain that the person is financially stable. For that reason, you were helping her — in theory — commit fraud with this “phony money,” especially if she was presenting her bank account to the lender. If the building’s co-op board saw a sudden $50,000 deposit they would have wanted you to sign a document testifying that it was indeed a gift, rather than a loan. And many banks won’t allow such a gift, unless it comes from a family member. In some rare cases, for instance, a fiancé could qualify as a family member.

Before you loan money to a friend, know this: Whether you lend $5 or $50,000, assume that you will never see it again. About two-thirds of people who have borrowed money say it was never returned, according to a survey of nearly 3,000 adults released by CouponCodesPro. They owed an average of $522 each, which puts your generosity and, perhaps, naivety into perspective. Ex-partners were among those tapped for money most often. What’s most alarming about that particular study: 60% of those said they borrow money a couple of times a year and 27% said they hit friends and family up for money most months. Again, it’s a proximity problem.

Related: I fell victim to the ‘easiest banking scam in the world,’ and $20,000 was stolen from my account. How could I have been such a fool?

Proving to the IRS it’s not a gift

People who have bad debts are generally only able to write off part of the loan that was documented in a loan agreement or, in an ideal scenario, one drafted by an attorney. A legal loan agreement should have all of the terms and interest rates, how the loan will be repaid (in installments or a lump sum) and by what date. A solid loan agreement should also be witnessed and notarized, which would help if there was a legal dispute. Now for the bad news (even if you did have an official loan agreement): The Internal Revenue Service puts a limit on such capital losses at $3,000 a year.

“The debt must have been a bona fide loan—you gave the money with every expectation of being repaid,” says TurboTax. “If you charged interest, and the borrower signed a promissory note, this provides a good indication that you expected to get your money back. Otherwise, the IRS might consider the exchange to be a gift, particularly if the borrower is a friend or a family member. And gifts aren’t tax deductible. The unpaid debt must be 100% worthless before you can deduct it. There must be no chance that the borrower can or will ever pay you back the amount of the loan. It is important to make a documented effort to collect your money with letters, invoices [and] phone calls.”

It’s more complicated when it comes to dealing with an undocumented loan. You would need to get a written statement from the third party to acknowledge the bad debt, so you could at least show proof; a check or receipt would also help. This is more complicated and may require advice from a financial planner or attorney. The IRS typically considers gifts to immediate family members as gifts rather than loans and you must show that the loan to your friend wasn’t a gift — that is, there was no expectation that it would go unpaid — and stipulate your relationship to the third party. But a write-off of $3,000 is a drop in the ocean compared to the $50,000 you loaned this woman.

She won’t pay it back if there is no reason to do so. Like I told this man who had $100,000 he gave to a contractor for materials, furniture and appliances, the contractor broke down in tears not because he suddenly had a change of heart but because he believed he was going to be publicly exposed. If he had any qualms about stealing money from one of his clients – and was unable to go about his day-to-day life after spending his $100,000 — he would not have done it in the first place. The same is true for this woman. If she cared about you, she would have insisted on having a notarized loan agreement, if only to make sure you got your money back in case something happened to her before she repaid it. The best in you appealed to the worst in her.

It’s a devastating realization.

The Moneyist regrets he cannot reply to questions individually.

Previous columns by Quentin Fottrell:

‘I don’t want anyone telling me what to do’: My second husband wants to put our $750,000 home in a trust for his children. Does he have the right?

‘I’m conflicted’: I have two sons — one is a hard worker with kids and the other is a ‘carefree’ actor. Should I leave the ‘family man’ more money in my will?

‘We don’t want his daughter to lose out’: My late son named his brother, who is a minor, as beneficiary on his life-insurance policy. How do we rectify this?

Check out The Moneyist’s private Facebook group, where members help answer life’s thorniest money issues. Post your questions, or weigh in on the latest Moneyist columns.

By emailing your questions to The Moneyist or posting your dilemmas on The Moneyist Facebook group, you agree to have them published anonymously on MarketWatch.

By submitting your story to Dow Jones & Co., the publisher of MarketWatch, you understand and agree that we may use your story, or versions of it, in all media and platforms, including via third parties.

Compare